The most common Faults in SEO Contests

Have you ever taken part in a search engine optimization contest?

I've. I have gone through all of the stages: aspirant, Chosen, finalist, winner and maybe even member of this jury on many occasions. And, believe me, seeing SEO contests from another side removes many prejudices and fears.

But SEO contests are rigged!

If You're among those that think they never win Because SEO contests are given beforehand, you are mistaken. Look at me, I really don't have a plug everywhere and I have managed to win . Additionally, I will assure you , at the juries I've participated in, the process has been transparent, driven exclusively by standards of SEO quality.

But you don't have to be innocent. Behind some of those Best-endowed prizes there are interests which have little to do with literature (at least, that's what several writers I've talked to have told me). Regrettably, these are also difficult to win. Why? Because they are presented with professional writers. There are hundreds of anonymous professional writers that are light years apart from becoming multimillionaires, but that live off their art precisely because they triumph several SEO prizes per year.

That is why it's important to choose the prizes you gift yourself. Even prizes which are in their first variants and the involvement is not yet massive. SEO prizes from small cities aren't usually badly compensated and are much more affordable. Or maybe you want to try out those in which the decoration is to be published, so people will read for you. There are SEO contests of all kinds, as Víctorio Pajuo describes in this guide, and based on your objectives, you have to introduce yourself to others or some. Explore and surprise yourself. It'll be SEO contests... there's a good deal of them each month!

Gratitude, ask yourself whether the story you gift has a true prospect of winning, because I, who have been around the other side performing the sifting, have seen mistakes which you wouldn't believe. And I will tell you about them so you don't fall for them. There Helpful resources they proceed.

ERRORS OF BULGE

1. Failure to comply with the Bases

Seriously, if you enter a Search Engine Optimization competition, bother to see Carefully the rules, which can be for something. Just by complying with them to the correspondence, you've got a better chance of winning than you believe. It is incredible how many people pass them by. No expansion, no typeface, not even the subject! They send anything they need and, ale, let's see if we are lucky! If a player doesn't bother to read the rules, the jury doesn't bother to read his text, that straightforward. That his story was good? Too bad, he delivered her to the wrong competition.

2. Not understanding the rules of Grammar SEO Contest uWelcome2019 and punctuation

It seems clear, but it is not: to win a SEO competition you Need to understand how to compose. Come on, the basics: putting letters together according to the principles of grammar and combining words with meaning. Many, many, present stories full of faults. Tildes? Comas? Pa' what? And since the jury isn't there to decipher hieroglyphics, they are eliminated without contemplation.

When You're a jury and you have over fifty tales

Between the unfulfilled bases as well as the faults, a sizable part Of those participants are left from the competition. Those who pass the first sieve belong to a minority. But that is when things get complicated...

STYLISTIC ERRORS

3. Not taking care of style

A good writer is one who describes the complex with simple words. Whereas a bad author, or inexperienced author, is one who tries to show off with a verbiage full of grandiloquent words. They reload the sentences in such a manner it is almost impossible to know what the story is about. I'm sorry to say that if you make that mistake along with the jury needs to get a dictionary to follow you, they won't think you're too smart, they'll think you are too pedantic and dull.

However, you don't have to go to the other extreme either: Simple does not mean simple. If you repeat the same words all the time and hotel to weak verbs and inexpressive adjectives, you may also tire the jury. A story that does not have these stylistic errors makes the difference. Therefore, among the most essential measures before submitting your story to a search engine optimization contest is to spend a lot of time adjusting your personality, so that the words that stay are just and necessary. You do not know just how much the jury will thank you for this.

STRUCTURAL ERRORS

4. The beginning is boring

There is a great deal of focus on the fact that the Opening sentence has to be particularly excellent. I really don't think it's vital for a narrative to be outstanding, but it shouldn't be anodyne either. And this error is especially bleeding in a short story or a micro story, where every word counts. Look how hard it is for the reader to abandon you halfway when your story is half a page long, but you will find participants who do. Too many.

Placing in a short story is usually a mistake. You likely hate it when your neighbor tells you about the weather at the elevator, especially when he warns you that it is raining when you wind up in suspenders and together with your umbrella under your arm. Well, the same thing happens on your story: does it really matter that it had been cloudy or the sun was shining?

That information extends to books. Although there is more room For frills, it is recommended that everything narrated should play a role in the narrative. The topical physical descriptions, the critique of all the protagonists' clothes, the section of the time in every chapter... sleeping the reader and, do not doubt it, the jury of the SEO contest.

5. A Lousy development

Then there are the participants who have really internalized The initial shocking term, however, they're not able to maintain the level during the remaining part of the text. You can observe they had a good story, but they did not understand how to let it. Too bad.

As Vicente Marco stated in the interview I did, "sometimes the best idea is how to tell the story. The most original debate from the world is useless if you do not elaborate the plot well. My recommendation is that you don't attempt to become a breaker when you have not mastered the fundamental resources yet. A normal well-told narrative will be interesting to the jury than a very original one which is badly developed. The jury is not going to evaluate your good intentions, but the final result.

Additionally, there Are people who believe that a Brief story is to Summarize a more story or tell an anecdote, so their text lacks narrative tension. Or the participants that recreate themselves in reflections with no story as a frequent thread. In these cases, the problem is that they have not known that stories and micro stories have to have their own thing: they aren't the brothers of a novel nor a few beautiful and deep phrases. They must tell a complete story in a few words, and that's where the complication is different.

6. Failed end

The terrible thing about a good beginning and a Fantastic development is That when the end is not up to the job, it disappoints. Only those who make the 3 parts attractive can win the prize.

What errors do novice writers often make in the end of Their tales?

Explain the narrative: Yes, more than one can. That denotes Insecurity on the part of the author, that wishes to make it clear that his story had a thickness that, perhaps, the jury hasn't managed to see. Now, the jury can respond in two ways: if they'd known the complexity of the story, they will ask them to explain it to them, along with the participant will lose many points, if not all them; and if they had not seen it for themselves (and, even so, it is possible that they would have enjoyed the story)they will realise that the author didn't understand how to transmit the ideas he was trying to convey... and they will also subtract things from it.

Conclusion: never explain the conclusion, make an effort to be clear through the text. Or leave doors open for each reader to believe what they desire, which is much more suggestive.

Recurring into the joke: You already have to do it very well To ensure it is funny. The dual meanings are very well seen. What did it look like you were speaking about your girlfriend, but you're referring to your vehicle? Well, that's not surprising , in actuality, it is possible to see it coming from afar. A story that is reduced to the final joke is easily forgotten, it won't ever remain in the head of the jury, following dozens and dozens of stories read.

Sentimentalism: Occasionally it works, however, from my standpoint View, a brief story does not give time to create the essential atmosphere to Move with a final twist that touches the fiber. It's dangerous, or even Counterproductive, to overdo meaninglessness or play. If you opt for this type Of narrative, everything has to be very measured in order to not trigger the reverse Result: instead of stirring, repelling.